A study of platos phaedo and the separation of the body and soul

The soul is, on the one hand, something that a human being risks in battle and loses in death. It has been suggested for instance, by Snell19 that what is referred to as soul in either case is in fact thought of as one and the same thing, something that a person can risk and lose and that, after death, endures as a shade in the underworld. The suggestion is plausible, but cannot be verified.

A study of platos phaedo and the separation of the body and soul

Some of the principle arguments will be dealt with here by providing a brief account of their structure, and examining their validity and truth value, as seen by Plato and scholars of Plato. The suicide argument that Socrates offers early in the text is roughly made in the following form: Death is the separation of soul from body.

The philosopher acting as a philosopher, seeks to affect this separation as far as possible.

Navigate Guide

Therefore, the philosopher practices death. This is an argument that Socrates makes to illustrate why he in unafraid of dying, and why he is thinking rationally when he lacks this fear. Two thoughts to think about are that it is a problem for Plato and Socrates if you say the person dies, and the soul makes up the person because then the soul dies.

Remember, that Plato is using Socrates to show that the soul is immortal so this objection is certainly a problem that must be considered by scholars of the text. Another slight problem comes when Socrates advocates learning with the mind alone, which necessarily implies learning without the body or senses.

From the SparkNotes Blog

But does Plato truly mean that we can and should learn without the senses? It would most likely be terribly difficult to acquire skills requisite to knowledge if we could make no use of our senses.

This is the position that a lot of empiricists another type of philosophy in contrast to rationalists take on matters of knowledge and learning. There are parts of this text when Plato speaks about the sensibles and the form of properties.

His goal in such a discussion is to show that the sensibles are not the same things as the Forms. An example of the sensibles would be things in the world like horses, men, books, and mountains. They are what we perceive with our senses, and according to Plato they are inferior to the Forms.

The intangible, divine, perfect ideals of Beauty, Good, Truth and the like are examples of the Forms. Plato believes that knowledge of everything lies in the Forms and that they are necessary causes of all sensibles. The Forms are a sort of realm like heaven for Plato, where we commune with them as souls learning and doing the dialectic.

Socrates often draws analogies between the Forms and the soul in Platonic dialogues.

A study of platos phaedo and the separation of the body and soul

Plato wants to show that both the Forms and souls are indivisible and indestructible, but there are points in his texts when this becomes a very difficult task.

The immortality argument for the soul is outlined as follows: This is of course that a philosopher like Plato ought to address, but his argument for the immortality of the soul is otherwise quite impressive as Socrates presents it. And finally an important point to note about the Phaedo is the grace with which Socrates faces his final hours.

This work is quite a testimony to the character of Socrates, as Plato saw from his perspective, and an inspiration to those who truly believe in themselves and their personal philosophy.

The Internet Classics Archive | Phaedo by Plato

Socrates was a dedicated philosopher with a talent for discussion and a passion for learning. He was remembered by his friends for being wise and good-natured, and in the closing words of Phaedo, "such was the end of our comrade.Mar 05,  · NSFRI - Plato - Parmenides (plg: a-c) - If You Should Wish to Exercise Yourself - Duration: Pierre Grimes and the Noetic Society 17 views -eventually becomes harder and harder for soul to bring body back to life-Socrates should resent death since there is a chance his soul will not enter another body That Death is the separation of the body and the soul.

Why is the cyclic argument insufficient in context of the dialogue of Phaedo? Because the soul is not an intellect .

A study of platos phaedo and the separation of the body and soul

Summary of Plato's Phaedo Home / Authors, My PhD Comprehensive Exam Experiment, Phaedo of Plato, Socrates states separation from heats and colds of the body is best – death..

Then the body drags the soul into what changes while the soul wants to stay in the eternal and unchanging (ultimately communion with Gods and wisdom). Socrates begins by defining death as the separation of soul and body, and the state of being dead as the state in which soul and body exist separately from one .

And is this anything but the separation of soul and body? And being dead is the attainment of this separation; when the soul exists in herself, and is parted from the body and the body is parted from the soul-that is death?

Exactly: that . Phaedo is Plato’s literary and philosophical monument to the death, and to the life, of his master, Socrates. An excellent way to begin the study of philosophy is with this account of the end of.

Ancient Theories of Soul (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)